Legal Opinion

Doe v. Reivitz

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided September 28, 1987No. Nos. 86-2350, 86-2561PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CUDAHY, Circuit Judge.

This case presents the question whether, consistent with the equal protection clause and the Social Security Act (the “SSA”), otherwise qualified citizen and alien children may be denied benefits under the Aid to Families with Dependent Children-Unemployed Parent (“AFDC-UP”) program because their parents are illegal aliens. The district court struck down this restriction on both constitutional and statutory grounds. We affirm on the statutory basis and do not reach the constitutional issue.

*1443I.

The AFDC-UP assistance program is a branch of the more general Aid to Families…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. King v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Morton v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Batterton v. FrancisSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bankers Life and Casualty Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  2. Elizabeth Blackwell Health Center for Women v. KnollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
  3. 32 soc.sec.rep.ser. 494, unempl.ins.rep. Cch 15908a Esther Marcus v. Louis v. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Wagner Seed Company, Inc. v. George Bush, as President of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991
  5. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. PenaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API