Legal Opinion
Hoage v. Liberty Mut. Ins.
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 17, 1935No. 6411PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Appeal from a decree in the Supreme Court of the District in an equity proceeding under the District of Columbia Workmen’s Compensation Law1 overruling the motion of defendant (claimant), appellant Smith, to set aside a decree pro confesso against her and declaring the decree absolute, and also finally setting aside a compensation award to her by the Deputy Commissioner and enjoining her from attempting to enforce it.
On July 17, 1933, Henry Smith, a laborer employed by the Lake Stone Company, paving contractor, in the District, while engaged in patch work on the…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hoage v. Employers' Liability Assur. Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
- Ayers v. HoageCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933
- Speaks v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Liberty Mut. Ins. v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1933
3Cited by4 opinions
- J. v. Vozzolo, Inc., Successor to James Vincent Vozzolo v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' CompensationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Grain Handling Co. v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1938
- Pate Stevedoring Co. v. HendersonDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1942
- Andino v. DonovanDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1948