Legal Opinion
Ayers v. Hoage
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided January 30, 1933No. 5615PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ROBB, Associate Justice.
Prom 1925 to some time in January, 1931; appellant was employed in Langmead’s Arm Chair Lunch in the District. He was found to be suffering from tuberculosis, and filed a claim for compensation' with the deputy com-, missioner under the provisions of the Long-shoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensa*365tion Act of March 4,1927 (44 Stat. 1424, U. S. C. Supp. VI, title 33, c. 18, §§ 901-950 [33 USCA §§ 901-950]), made generally applicable to the District of Columbia by the Act of May 17,1928 (45 Stat. 600, D. C. Code, title 19, c. 2, §§ 11,12 [33 USCA § 901 note]).
After…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Madore v. New Departure Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- Indemnity Ins. Co. of North America v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1932
3Cited by11 opinions
- Southern Shipping Co. v. LawsonDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1933
- Fazio v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
- Speaks v. HoageCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
- Groom v. CardilloCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
- Trudenich v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.