Legal Opinion

Wagner v. Town of Garrett

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1889No. 13,568PublishedCited by 15 opinions

From the DeKalb Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.

The town of Garrett complained of Wagner and Zeek for having violated sections 1, 4 and 7 of one of the general ordinances of the town, which made it unlawful for any person, either directly or indirectly, to sell any spirituous, vinous, malt or other intoxicating liquors in a less quantity than a quart at a time, within the corporate limits, without being duly licensed. It is charged in the complaint that the defendants violated the above sections by selling intoxicating malt liquor and whiskey to persons named, in a less quantity than a quart, on several days named, without having first…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Marshall v. DonovanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  2. Commonwealth v. WrightCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1880
  3. Clevenger v. Town of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Murphy v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Ex parte LaboyteauxIndiana Supreme Court · 1879

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Welsh v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. State v. RichcreekIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Hammer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Moore v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1889

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API