Legal Opinion

State v. Richcreek

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1906No. 20,701PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From Criminal Court of Marion County (34,887); Fremont Alford, Judge. Prosecution by the State of Indiana against Seth M. Richcreek. From a judgment for defendant, the State appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

Appellee was charged by affidavit with having transacted a banking business on July 3, 1905, and for two days prior thereto, and with having used the words “bank,” “banker,” and “banking” in connection with said business without having filed with the Auditor of State a detailed statement under oath as required by the act of March 4, 1905 (Acts 1905, p. 182, §§2994a-2994j Burns 1905), entitled: “An act to regulate the business of banking by individuals, partnerships and unincorporated persons.” The affidavit was quashed, upon appellee’s motion, for the alleged reason'that it did not contain…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  2. Dent v. West VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  3. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Bank of Augusta v. EarleSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  5. Crowley v. ChristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Collins v. DayIndiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. PoetkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  3. State Ex Rel. Davis v. RoseSupreme Court of Florida · 1929
  4. State v. BarrettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Albert v. Milk Control Board of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 1936

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API