Legal Opinion
United States v. Roblero-Solis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 2, 2009No. 08-10396, 08-10509, 08-10397, 08-10512, 08-10466, 08-10543PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NOONAN, Circuit Judge:
To accommodate the enormous number of prosecutions for illegal entry into the United States, the district court for the District of Arizona (Tucson) has adopted a procedure for the taking of pleas en masse intended to preserve the rudiments of Fed. R.Crim.P. 11 and the constitution. We were informed by the government in this case that one magistrate judge is assigned each week full time to the handling of these cases and that in twelve months’ time the court has handled 25,000. The procedure has been in practice for at least two years and is apparently followed in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sibron v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Olivia Martinez-MartinezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. Liquidators of European Federal Credit BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. Escamilla-RojasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Wilbur v. City of Mount VernonDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2013
- United States v. Gilberto Aguilar-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Diaz-RamirezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.