United States v. Diaz-Ramirez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether the taking of guilty pleas at a large group plea hearing violated the Fifth Amendment right to due process.
I
A
On November 23, 2009, Odi Ereldi Diaz-Ramirez (“Diaz”) and Ismael Figueroa-Romero (“Figueroa”) were arrested and charged with illegal entry into the United States, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1325. Both Mexican citizens, Diaz and Figueroa were apprehended near Sasabe, Arizona, and were charged with having entered the United States at a time and place other than that designated by immigration officials. The next day, they appeared at a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Oscar Chavez-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gilberto Aguilar-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Delcia Arqueta-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Avendano-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024