Legal Opinion

United States v. Diaz-Ramirez

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 23, 2011No. 10-10230, 10-10231PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

O’SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge:

We must decide whether the taking of guilty pleas at a large group plea hearing violated the Fifth Amendment right to due process.

I

A

On November 23, 2009, Odi Ereldi Diaz-Ramirez (“Diaz”) and Ismael Figueroa-Romero (“Figueroa”) were arrested and charged with illegal entry into the United States, pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1325. Both Mexican citizens, Diaz and Figueroa were apprehended near Sasabe, Arizona, and were charged with having entered the United States at a time and place other than that designated by immigration officials. The next day, they appeared at a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  5. Bradshaw v. StumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Oscar Chavez-DiazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  2. United States v. Gilberto Aguilar-VeraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Delcia Arqueta-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
  4. United States v. Avendano-SotoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API