Legal Opinion

Danneman v. Pickett

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 10, 1991No. 59517PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRANDALL, Judge.

Plaintiff, Walter A. Danneman, appeals from the judgment, entered pursuant to a jury verdict, in favor of defendant, Bonnie Louise Pickett. Plaintiff claims he suffered bodily injury when he was struck by an automobile driven by defendant. The cause was submitted to the jury on a negligence theory. The jury found in favor of defendant, assessing 100 percent of the fault to plaintiff. We affirm.

The evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict, discloses that defendant was hired by plaintiff and his wife to care for their two children in the family home. When…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lawson v. Schumacher & Blum Chevrolet, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Bayer v. American Mutual Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
  3. MacHeca v. FowlerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Matter of Estate of MitchellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  5. Curtain v. AldrichMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wulfing v. Kansas City Southern Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Goede v. Aerojet General Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Beis v. DiasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Riley v. Union Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Graves v. Atchison-Holt Electric Coop.Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API