Legal Opinion

Thomas v. AT & T Services, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided March 20, 2013No. Case No. 1:11 CV 02768PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

DONALD C. NUGENT, District Judge.

This case is before the Court on Defendant AT & T Services, Inc.’s (“AT & T”) Motion for Summary Judgment on the claims of Plaintiff Sharon Thomas (ECF # 29). Plaintiff Thomas brings claims of race discrimination1 and retaliation under Ohio Revised Code. § 4112.02.2

Even when viewed in a light most favorable to Plaintiff, the evidence does not support her claims that she was let go from her job because of the racist or retaliatory motives of others. Instead, the record is replete with evidence that Plaintiff became so focused on her…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tanksley v. HowellOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Harper v. City of ClevelandDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API