Darwin J. Urry v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Per curiam
The appellant was charged with the interstate transportation of a stolen automobile in violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 2312. A guilty plea was entered and he was sentenced. More than sixty days after sentencing, appellant filed a motion for modification of sentence. The trial court denied appellant’s motion on the ground that it was untimely.
Appellant urges that authority to modify the sentence following the expiration of sixty days is found in Rule 45(c) and in United States v. Murray, 275 U.S. 347, 48 S.Ct. 146, 72 L.Ed. 309, and that such authorities prevail over Rule 35 of the Rules of…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- United States Ex Rel. Quinn v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1947
- United States v. Chicago Professional Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Nevarez-DiazDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1986
- United States v. HughesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
- United States v. ReevesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- United States v. EstelaDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1972
- United States v. FitzgeraldDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.