Legal Opinion
United States v. Hughes
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 12, 1964PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HERLANDS, District Judge.
Does a “reduction” of sentence have the same effect as an “imposition” of sentence for the purpose of Rule 35, F.R.Crim.Proc., so as to start anew the *26running of the sixty-day period within which the Court may again reduce the sentenced
This question of novel impression is presented by the motion at bar by the defendant for a further reduction of his sentence. He seeks to reduce his sentence heretofor imposed on June 17, 1964, “to the time already served.”
The following is the pertinent chronology :
June 21, 1963 Sentence of 18 months imposed.
May 18,1964 Receipt of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fallen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Darwin J. Urry v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Stebbins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Chicago Professional Schools, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. FerriCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- United States v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. United States District Court, Central District of California, Maurice H. Friedman and John Rosselli, Real Parties in Interest. United States of America v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. John RosselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Joseph LlinasCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1982
- United States v. RannazzisiDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.