Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Rosen
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided November 19, 2001No. 00-9268PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment of the District Court is hereby REMANDED for reconsideration.
Brian Copeland appeals from Judge Leisure’s dismissal of his complaint without prejudice pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) and 16(f). Appellant contends first that because his claim is now time-barred, the dismissal without prejudice is in reality a harsher punishment than it seems. Second, he contends that the district court erred in its description of relevant facts and overstated the extent of his counsel’s dilatory conduct in the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. MallisSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Rita J. Minnette v. Time WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Gemeral Earnest Berry, Jr. v. Cigna/rsi-CignaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. JacobsonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Vicki H. Brown v. Hartshorne Public School District 1, Janie Trueblood Lorraine Hollis Jack Holloway Tommy McCullar Dr. Roy HoneywellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Cohn v. KeySpan Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2010
- Hagan v. Katz Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2016
- Copeland v. RosenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- El' Divine Starkim Allah-El v. Allied Universal Security, et al.District Court, S.D. New York · 2026
- Joseph v. County of WestchesterDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.