Legal Opinion
Copeland v. Rosen
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 24, 2002No. 96 Civ. 6308(PKL)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LEISURE, District Judge.
Pursuant to Rule 41(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and based on the prior rulings of this Court and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, defendants Cheryl Rosen and the New York City Board of Education, move to dismiss plaintiffs case presently before this Court on remand from the Second Circuit. For the following reasons, defendants’ motion is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
The facts of this case are set forth in detail in two earlier opinions of this Court, Copeland v. Rosen, 194 F.R.D. 127 (S.D.N.Y.2000) (“Copeland I”); 196 F.R.D. 20 (S.D.N.Y.…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Goodman v. Lukens Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re HSBC Bank, USA, N.A., Debit Card Overdraft Fee LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014