Rulien v. Employment Division

This case is before us a second time. Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Employment Appeals Board (EAB) that denied him unemployment compensation, because he was not “available for work.” ORS 657.155(1)(c). We reversed EAB’s first order that denied benefits, because it had failed to make adequate findings to support its conclusion that claimant was not credible. Rulien v. Employment Division, 70 Or App 703, 690 P2d 530 (1984). We again reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Petitioner was laid off in August, 1983, and applied for unemployment compensation. In September, 1983, he…