Legal Opinion

Tri-Fanucchi Farms v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board

California Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2017No. S227270PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLiu, J.

*1163 In 2012, Tri-Fanucchi Farms (Tri-Fanucchi) refused to bargain with the United Farm Workers of America (the UFW), the labor union that its employees had elected in 1977 as their bargaining representative under the Agricultural Labor Relations Act (the ALRA or the Act). Tri-Fanucchi argued that the union had abandoned its employees for more than two decades and thus forfeited its status as bargaining representative. Consistent with its longstanding practice, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board (the Board or the ALRB) rejected the employer's abandonment defense and determined that…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Virginia Electric & Power Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  3. Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  4. In Re DannenbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  5. California Assn. of Psychology Providers v. RankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Gerawan Farming, Inc. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. Boling v. Pub. Emp't Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. Arnaudo Bros., L.P. v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Arnaudo Brothers v. ALRBCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. Arnaudo Brothers v. Agric. Labor Relations Bd.California Supreme Court · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API