Legal Opinion

Indemnification of Treasury Department Officers and Employees

Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel

Decided March 4, 1991Published

1Opinion of the Court

Indemnification of Treasury Department Officers and Employees T h e D epartm ent o f Treasury m ay use its general appropriations funds to indem nify any o f its officers and em ployees against personal liability for conduct arising out o f actions taken w ithin the co u rse and scope o f their em ploym ent, if the D epartm ent concludes that such indem nification is necessary to ensure effective perform ance o f the D epartm ent’s m ission. 28 U .S.C . § 2 0 0 6 and 26 U .S.C. § 7423(2) also provide specific authority for the D epartm ent o f the T reasury to indem nify, in certain circum…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Barr v. MatteoSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API