Legal Opinion

Matthews v. Brookstone Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided January 11, 2007No. Civil Action 05-0369-WS-CPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED ORDER

STEELE, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on defendant D & M Sales, Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Second Amended Class Action Complaint (doc. 100). The Motion has been briefed and is ripe for disposition. 1

I. Background.

In her Second Amended Class Action Complaint (doc. 94), plaintiff Laura Matthews brings claims arising from her purchase of a “Pure-Ion” air purifier from a Brookstone retail store in Georgia in December 2004. Plaintiff maintains that she purchased her air purifier from defendants Brookstone, Inc. (“Brookstone, Inc.”), Brookstone Company, Inc.…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Purdue Research Foundation v. Sanofi-Synthelabo, S.A., Sanofi-Synthelabo, Incorporated, and Stwb, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  2. Miller Yacht Sales, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  3. GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
  4. Meier Ex Rel. Meier v. Sun International Hotels, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  5. Cybersell, Inc. v. Cybersell, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Brown Ex Rel. Rhiner v. KerkhoffDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2007
  2. Sanchez v. Launch Technical Workforce Solutions, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2018
  3. In re Blue Cross Blue Shield Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2016
  4. Atchison v. IPC Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2011
  5. Continental Motors, Inc. v. Jewell Aircraft, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API