Legal Opinion
Nautilus Group, Inc. v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided July 30, 2003No. C02-2420PPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
PECHMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff, manufacturer and patent-holder of the BowFlex exercise machine, moves for a preliminary injunction barring Defendant, the manufacturer of the CrossBow, from using the trademark “CrossBow” on exercise equipment. (Dkt. No. 63.) Because Plaintiff has shown a probability of success on the merits and the possibility of irreparable injury, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff The Nautilus Group, Inc. (“Nautilus”) manufactures the BowFlex exercise machine, which incorporates resilient rods to…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Amf Incorporated, a Corporation v. Sleekcraft Boats, a Sole Proprietorship, and Bruce E. Nescher, an IndividualCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- Brookfield Communications, Inc. v. West Coast Entertainment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- GoTo.Com, Inc. v. Walt Disney Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Provenz v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- The Nautilus Group, Inc. (Formerly Known as Direct Focus, Inc.) v. Icon Health and Fitness, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. TerryDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2012
- Clearly Food & Beverage Co. v. Top Shelf Beverages, Inc.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2015
- United States v. Martinez-LeonDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2008
- Abrams v. Sequium Asset Solutions LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2023
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.