Abrams v. Sequium Asset Solutions LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 JAMES R. ABRAMS, CASE NO. 21-CV-05374-LK 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 v. AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 13 SEQUIUM ASSET SOLUTIONS, LLC, ATTORNEY FEES 14 Defendant. 15 16 Before the Court is Plaintiff James Abrams’ Motion for Attorney Fees. Dkt. No. 39. For 17 the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. Abrams is 18 entitled to the reasonable fees incurred prior to the expiration of Defendant Sequium Asset 19 Solutions, LLC’s Rule 68 offer…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Burlington v. DagueSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.