Legal Opinion
County of Los Angeles v. Hale
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 10, 1958No. Civ. 23268PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
On May 18, 1953, the county of Los Angeles filed a complaint in eminent domain, Number 613875, against 54 named defendants, including Bessie L. Hale, to condemn 29 separate parcels of land, one of which, Parcel 25-1, was a part of a larger tract owned by Bessie L. and Luther Hale, appellants. The taking was for the purpose of widening Santa Pe Avenue. Appellants filed their answer February 7, 1955, and the case was set for hearing on June 15, 1955. One week before trial, the action relating only to Parcel 25-1 was taken off calendar. As it related to the other 28 parcels, the action was tried…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Los Angeles v. AbbottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. ChubbCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- People v. Southern Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
- City of Bell v. American States Water & Service Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Silver Lake Power & Irrigation Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- County of Los Angeles v. OrtizCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- La Mesa-Spring Valley School District v. Nobuo OtsukaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- County of Kern v. GalatasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Decoto School District v. M. & S. Tile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1964
- Mountain View Union High School District v. OrmondeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.