Legal Opinion
Ruggiero v. American Bioculture, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 11, 1972No. Nos. 72 Civ. 581, 71 Civ. 4607 and 72 Civ. 776PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAUMAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs Freed and Liss have moved for an order pursuant to Rules 23 and 42 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure declaring their actions, 71 Civ. 4607 and 72 Civ. 776, class actions and consolidating them with Ruggiero, et al. v. American Bioculture, Inc., 72 Civ. 581, which has already been declared a class action. They also seek to have their counsel, the firm of Shea, Gould, Climenko & Kramer, designated lead counsel for the consolidated class actions. Plaintiffs Ruggiero and Polizotto oppose these motions and have moved pursuant to Rule 23 for an order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Mersay v. First Republic Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968
- Herbst v. AbleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1969
- Lewis v. Shaffer Stores CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1963
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of America v. HoffaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1965
- Maynard, Merel & Co. v. CarcioppoloDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Boilermakers Local 154 Retirement Fund v. Chevron Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2013
- In re Consumers Power Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1985
- In Re Seagate Technology II Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1994
- Stull v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1976
- Barrett v. Southern Connecticut Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.