Legal Opinion
American Engineering Co. v. Stoker Castings & Service, Inc.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided December 21, 1944No. 118PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
FORD, District Judge.
The plaintiff, a Pennsylvania corporation and manufacturer of heavy industrial machinery including the Taylor underfeed stoker, has brought this suit against the defendants, a Massachusetts corporation manufacturing replacement parts for underfeed stokers and the general manager and operator of it, for infringement of United States Patent No. 1,930,897 (hereinafter called the Hughes patent) issued October 17, 1933 to William J. Hughes, on application filed April 13, 1928. The plaintiff is the assignee-owner of the patent in suit. The defenses are invalidity and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Expanded Metal Co. v. BradfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Forestek Plating & Mfg. Co. v. Knapp-Monarch Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Boyce v. Stewart-Warner Speedometer Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1914
- E. H. Bardes Range & Foundry Co. v. American Engineering Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- American Engineering Co. v. Stoker Castings & Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1946