Legal Opinion
G. A. Nichols, Inc. v. Hainey
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 27, 1942No. 30284PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action by plaintiff, G. A. Nichols, Inc., to cancel a contract made by it with defendant Hainey for the sale of lots 17 and 18, block 6, in the town of Nichols Hills, or in the alternative for specific performance of the contract. The trial court canceled the contract, and gave Hainey judgment against plaintiff for $586.50, with interest from December 27, 1939, at 6 per cent per annum until paid. Plaintiff appeals.
The facts are these: On April 17, 1937, Hainey, who was employed by Southwestern Bell Telephone Company at a salary of $7.60 per day, by written contract agreed to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Minnetonka Oil Co. v. Cleveland Vitrified Brick Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Putnam City Co. v. Minnetonka Lbr. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Shields v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Sonken-Galambra Corp. v. AbelsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
- Kansas City Pants & Skirt Co. v. CohlmiaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
3Cited by12 opinions
- Davis v. GwaltneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1955
- Bonner v. Oklahoma Rock Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Trapkus v. Edstrom's, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Ervin v. . Conn and Bank v. . FredericksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Zenith Drilling Corp. v. Internorth, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.