Legal Opinion

Kansas City Pants & Skirt Co. v. Cohlmia

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 17, 1929No. 19164PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

Plaintiff in error, Kansas City Pants & Skirt Company, referred to as plaintiff, sued defendant in error, Frank Cohlmia, referred to as defendant, to recover the sum of $830.85, as a balance due plaintiff for merchandise sold to defendant between the dates of August 9, 1923, and February 14, 1924, at AVaynoka. The original account was for $1,682.40, whereon defendant, on various dates from December 17, 1923, to January 21, 1924, had paid a total sum of $851.55. A verified statement of the account was attached to the petition.

By his answer defendant denied the account, and further…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tipton v. . FeitnerNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  2. Tufts v. WeinfeldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Springfield Seed Co. v. WaltMissouri Court of Appeals · 1902
  4. Lee v. SimmonsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Tichnor Bros. v. EvansSupreme Court of Vermont · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G. A. Nichols, Inc. v. HaineySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  2. Fine v. H. & H. Pioneer Savings Stamp Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API