Abbott Laboratories and Mitsubishi-Tokyo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Formerly Known as Tokyo Tanabe Co., Ltd.) v. Dey, L.P. And Dey, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs Mitsubishi-Tokyo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Abbott Laboratories appeal the decision of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois granting defendants Dey L.P. and Dey, Inc. summary judgment of noninfringement of U.S. Patent No. 4,897,839 (“the '839 patent”). Because the district court improperly precluded plaintiffs from relying on the doctrine of equivalents to prove infringement, we vacate the judgment of noninfringement and remand for further proceedings in accordance with this opinion.
BACKGROUND
I
Tokyo Tanabe Company, Ltd., now…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Athletic Alternatives, Inc. v. Prince Manufacturing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Apple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Trustees of Columbia Univ. v. Symantec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Cohesive Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- Adams Respiratory Therapeutics, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.