Legal Opinion
Canadian River Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 4, 1940No. 1931PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.
The Canadian River Gas Company,1 the Colorado Interstate Gas Company,2 and the Colorado-Wyoming Gas Company3 are corporations organized and existing under the laws of the state of Delaware.4
The Canadian Company is engaged in the production and gathering of natural gas in the Amarillo Field in Texas and the transportation thereof through its main natural gas pipe line from the Amarillo Field to Clayton, N. M. Substantially all the gas produced by it is sold to the Colorado Company at Clayton, N. M., or at Gray, Okla. A small portion of such gas is sold and delivered by…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Rochester Telephone Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Petroleum Exploration, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Los Angeles & Salt Lake RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- United States v. Illinois Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company and Arizona Power Authority, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Colorado Interstate Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Amerada Petroleum Corporation v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956
- Jersey Central Power & Light Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.