Hankins v. Lawrence
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Fayette Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.
This was an action of trespass quare clau-. sum fregit, brought by Hankins for breaking and entering his close, digging holes in the same, &c. Plea, that, at, &c., the defendant was an engineer in the employment of the White Water Valley Canal Company; that by virtue of their charter and in pursuance of their order, he entered the close' and took possession of an acre of land adjoining a certain lock and hydraulic power on the canal, situate, &c.; that said acre of land was and is necessary for a site for erecting, and propelling by water, a grist-mill, oil-mill, carding machine, and woolen…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rubottom v. M'ClureIndiana Supreme Court · 1838
3Cited by17 opinions
- Snowden v. WilasIndiana Supreme Court · 1862
- Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Anderson v. Kerns Draining Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1860
- Ryerson v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Sheets v. Vandalia Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1920
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.