Ryerson v. Brown
Michigan Supreme Court
Certiorari to Judge of Probate of Mecosta County.
1Opinion of the Court
*Cooley, Oh. J.:
The proceedings in this case were taken under “An act to revise and amend an act entitled ‘An act to encourage the erection and support of water power manufactories,’ approved March 21, 1865,” the amendatory act having been approved April 30, 1873. The second section of the act provides that “whenever any person shall desire to erect and maintain a water-power mill on his own land, or upon the land of another with his consent, or who has heretofore erected any such mill, or who shall desire to erect and maintain a dam on the same for the purpose of operating such mill by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Sadler v. LanghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Olmstead v. CampSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1866
- Tyler v. BeacherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1871
- Hay v. Cohoes Co.New York Supreme Court · 1848
- Venard v. CrossSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wayne County v. HathcockMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Thayer v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Risser v. HoytMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- Varner v. MartinWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1883
- Brown v. GeraldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1905
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.