Rubottom v. M'Clure
Indiana Supreme Court
ERROR to the Wabash Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtDewey, J.
M’Clure declared in trespass against Rubottom and Cassatt. The declaration contains two counts. The first sets out a breach of close, and lays, in aggravation of damages, the cutting down a number of trees, and the taking and carrying away them and a quantity of other timber. The second count is for taking and carrying away other trees.
*506General issue, and three special pleas. Each of the latter professes to answer the whole of the declaration, and avers that the defendants were in the employment of the commissioners of the Wabash and Erie canal; that they entered upon the close in the first…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Beekman v. Saratoga & Schenectady Rail RoadNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Bradshaw v. RodgersNew York Supreme Court · 1822
- Bloodgood v. Mohawk & Hudson Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1835
- Wheelock v. YoungNew York Supreme Court · 1830
- Meylin v. WoodfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1823
3Cited by17 opinions
- Bayh v. SonnenburgIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
- Sadler v. LanghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1859
- Lake Erie, Wabash & St. Louis Railroad v. HeathIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
- Prather v. Jeffersonville, Madison & Indianapolis RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1875
- Old Colony Railroad v. Framingham Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.