Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Puget Sound Broadcasting Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided December 14, 1932No. 24021. Department OnePublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This appeal results from a judgment in favor of respondents, who are husband and wife, and suing as such, who were engaged in the business of radio advertising in Seattle. Appellant, Seattle Broadcasting Co., operated a broadcasting station in Seattle known as, KOL. Defendant Puget Sound Broadcasting Co., during all the time embraced in this action operated a broadcasting station known as KYI at Kent, Washington, and had studios in both Seattle and Tacoma. Both were sued to recover $4,100 as damages for breach of a written contract between respondents and defendant Puget Sound Broadcasting…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Lockit Cap Co. v. Globe Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Jurisch v. Puget Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. McCormick v. TappendorfWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Schultz v. Wells Butchers' Supply Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Stokes v. Magnolia Milling Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Blakiston v. Osgood Panel & Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Puget Sound Service Corp. v. BushCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1986
  3. Automatic Canteen Co. v. Automatic Canteen Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Citizens Savings & Loan Society v. ChapmanWashington Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Harty Investment Group, Llc v. Chg Sf, LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API