Legal Opinion
McCormick v. Tappendorf
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 4, 1909No. 7446PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Clarke county, Reid, J., entered October 24, 1907, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtHadley, C. J.
— This is an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of contract to deliver a quantity of railroad ties. The terms of the contract are set forth in the following copy of a part of the correspondence between the parties:
*313“Portland, Oregon, January 23, 1906.
“Vancouver Lumber Company, Vancouver, Wash.
“Gentlemen: We hereby confirm our order for 50,000 pieces of 7x8-8' merchantable Oregon pine ties. These ties not to run over 20 per cent No. 2 merchantable. Any excess No. 2 to be $2.00 per thousand feet less. Inspection and tally at loading point by inspector from Pacific Lumber…
2Cited by16 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ThorpeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1981
- Loveladies Property Owners Ass'n, Inc. v. BARNEGAT CITY, ETC., CO.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Commonwealth v. BoyarskyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Kreger v. HallWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- Commonwealth v. TavaresMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.