Legal Opinion
Yang v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 12, 2001PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles Ramos, J.), entered January 24, 2000, which granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the consolidated second amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiffs, individual investors who purchased interests in limited partnerships engaged in the trading of futures and options contracts, allege that the Dean Witter brokers who sold them such units misrepresented the suitability of such investments for plaintiffs and a putative class of similarly situated conservative investors. To the extent the named plaintiffs have alleged with…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perl v. Smith Barney Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Smith v. Triad Manufacturing Group, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Fekety v. Gruntal & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Schwarz v. Bear Stearns Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Societe Nationals d'Exploitation Industrielle des Tabacslumettes v. Salomon Bros. International Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- HSH Nordbank AG v. UBS AGAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In Re Sterling Foster & Co., Inc., Securities Lit.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- Gray v. Seaboard Securities, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- M & T Bank Corp. v. LaSalle Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2012
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.