Legal Opinion
Fekety v. Gruntal & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 25, 1993PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold Tompkins, J.), entered January 6, 1992, which, insofar as appealed from, granted defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint to the extent of dismissing the first cause of action for violation of the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO; 18 USC § 1961 et seq.) with prejudice, and the fifth cause of action for common law fraud with leave to replead, and denied plaintiffs’ cross-motion for leave to amend the complaint so as to add causes of action for violation of fiduciary duty, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
The seven…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Airlines Reporting Corp. v. Aero Voyagers, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Rush v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1988
- Dow v. MeyersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by10 opinions
- Fesseha v. TD Waterhouse Investor Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Perl v. Smith Barney Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- BNP Paribas Mortgage Corp. v. Bank of America, N.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Press v. Chemical Investment Services Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Yang v. Morgan Stanley Dean WitterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.