Amalgamated Transit Union, Division 819 v. Byrne
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SEITZ, Chief Judge.
This case poses the question of whether officials of the State of New Jersey violated the federal policy of allowing the content of collective bargaining agreements to be determined “by the free play of economic forces” when they threatened to withdraw State subsidies of private transportation companies which agree with their unions to include unlimited cost of living increases in their collective bargaining agreements. NLRB v. Nash-Finch Co., 404 U.S. 138, 144, 92 S.Ct. 373, 30 L.Ed.2d 328 (1971). The district court concluded that the complaint filed by…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- National Labor Relations Board v. Gissel Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- National League of Cities v. UserySupreme Court of the United States · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- D.P. Enterprises, Inc. v. Bucks County Community CollegeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Legal Aid Society v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Golden State Transit Corporation a California Corporation v. City of Los Angeles, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Massachusetts Nurses Association v. Michael S. DukakisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Tristani Ex Rel. Karnes v. RichmanDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.