Legal Opinion
Watertown Housing Authority v. Kirkland
Watertown City Court
Decided September 3, 2003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
James C. Harberson, Jr, J.
Facts
The Watertown Housing Authority (W.H.A.) has instituted three summary proceedings in this court based on nonpayment of rent as provided under RPAPL 711 (2): Watertown Hous. Auth. v Kirkland & Baia (Index No. 21216LT [Kirkland/Baia)), Watertown Hous. Auth. v Bagby (Index No. 21217LT) and Watertown Hous. Auth. v Nelson (Index No. 21213LT). The respondents have argued that the total payment when offered was reduced by the W.H.A. by various amounts reflecting unpaid late charges (Bagby), seasonal air-conditioning charges (Kirkland/Baia) and a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Thorpe v. Housing Authority of DurhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Wright v. City of Roanoke Redevelopment & Housing AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Liss v. Trans Auto Systems, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Binghamton Housing Authority v. DouglasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Brattleboro Housing Authority v. Parker (In Re Parker)District Court, D. Vermont · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Lorain Metro. Hous. Auth. v. Noel, 06ca009006 (6-11-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Neighbors of Watertown, Inc. v. PearsonWatertown City Court · 2005