Legal Opinion
Allington & Curtis Mfg. Co. v. Globe Co.
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio
Decided November 9, 1898PublishedCited by 3 opinions
These were suits in equity by the Ailing ton & Curtis Manufacturing Company and the Knickerbocker Company against the Globe Company and Thomas Lee, respectively, for tlie infringement of certain patents.
1Opinion of the Court
TAFT, Circuit Judge.
These are bills to restrain the alleged infringement of four patents, No. 403,362, No. 403,363, No. 403,770, issued to Orville II. Morse, and No. 409,465, issued to Noah W. Holt, all for an improvement in dust collectors. Claim 2 of letters patent No. 403,363 is as follows:
“A dust collector, consisting of a tapering separating chamber, having an imperforate peripheral wall, in which the whirling body of air forms a vortex, and in which the air moves from the periphery towards the axis of the vortex as it becomes freed from the solid matter; said chamber' having at its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Miller v. Eagle Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Thomson-Houston Electric Co. v. Ohio Brass Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
- National Cash Register Co. v. American Cash Register Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1892
- Knickerbocker Co. v. RogersDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1894
- Office Specialty Manuf'g Co. v. Winternight & Cornyn Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dayton Fan & Motor Co. v. Westinghouse Electric & Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
- Waterbury Buckle Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1923
- Waterbury Buckle Co. v. G. E. Prentice Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922