Legal Opinion

Reese v. Grant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 27, 2004No. S04A0870PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Thompson, Justice.

Appellee Hal Grant sued his former wife, appellant Tanya Grant Reese, alleging that she was in wilful contempt of an indemnification provision of the settlement agreement incorporated into their final judgment and decree of divorce. Although the trial court refused to find Reese in contempt, it nonetheless ordered her to pay attorney fees incurred by Grant.

The order is silent as to whether attorney fees were awarded pursuant to OCGA § 9-15-14 because the trial court believed that Grant was forced to defend against groundless and frivolous litigation, 1 or whether the award…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Betallic, Inc. v. DeavoursSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  2. Carson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mixon v. MixonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
  2. Hearn v. DOLLAR RENT a CAR, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Dan J. Sheehan Co. v. Fairlawn on Jones Homeowners' Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  4. Hall v. Monroe CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
  5. Razavi v. MerchantCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2014

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API