Legal Opinion

Micco v. Replogle

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 4, 1935No. 24177PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBayless, J.

The plaintiffs in error, Amanda Micco, Mary Deere, Lasley Buckner, sometimes known as Lassley Bull, and Solomon Buckley, who were plaintiffs below, appeal to this court from a judgment of the district court of Creek county, Okla., in favor of defendants in error, D. Replogle and H. L. Graves, who were defendants below. Except where it is necessary to refer to the individual parties by name, they, will be referred to in this opinion in groups as they appeared in the trial court.

The cause of action involves the title to three allotments of 160 acres each. The allottees were Charley Keys and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Reeves v. CrumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  2. Calkins v. Ponca CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Harris v. International Land Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Ahfonoke v. BullettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Channell v. JonesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  2. Greenwood v. State Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API