Legal Opinion

Continental Land & Fur Co. v. Lacoste

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided April 3, 1939No. 35165PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

O’NIELL, Chief Justice.

This is a petitory action. The property in contest is a shell mound, having an area of about 10 acres, located on the east bank of the Atchafalaya River, in the Parish of Terrebonne. The defendant claims title by virtue of two patents from the State, issued to his grandparents. Hé pleaded, in the alternative, the prescription of ten years and of thirty years. The judge of the district court sustained the plea of prescription of thirty years and rejected the plaintiff’s demand. The plaintiff is appealing from the decision.

The tract of land described in the two patents on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leader Realty Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1920
  2. Ellis v. PrevostSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1841
  3. Albert Hanson Lumber Co. v. AngellozSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1907
  4. Ernest Realty Co. v. Hunter Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
  5. Frantom v. NelsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Hill v. RicheySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1952
  2. Labarre v. RateauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1946
  3. De Hart v. Continental Land & Fur Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  4. Long v. ChailanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1940
  5. Richardson & Bass v. Board of Levee CommissionersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API