Legal Opinion

Spack v. Puorro

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided January 23, 1997PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WATHEN, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Defendant Michael Puorro appeals from an order entered in the Superior Court (Piscataquis County, Mead J.) denying his motion for relief from an attachment order. Having failed to file a timely appeal from the order granting the attachment, defendant moved for relief pursuant to M.R.Civ.P. 60(b)(4). On the merits, he argues that the attachment order should have been declared void due to improper service of process. Because of the peculiar procedural posture of this case, we have no occasion to address the merits and must dismiss defendant’s appeal.

[¶ 2] A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McInnes v. McKaySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1928
  2. Foley v. JacquesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
  3. Brengelmann v. Land Resources of New England & Canada, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  4. Rosenbery v. TaylorSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Porrazzo v. KarofskySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. SOUTHERN MAINE PROPERTIES CO. v. JohnsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. CENTRIX BANK AND TRUST v. KehlSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2012
  4. Maguire Construction, Inc. v. ForsterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  5. Nynex Worldwide Services Group, Inc. v. DineenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API