Legal Opinion

Rosenbery v. Taylor

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 21, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLASSMAN, Justice.

By this appeal, Taylor’s Millwork, Inc., Carve Masters, Inc. and Consolidated Mill-works, Inc. (Millwork) challenge the decision of the trial court (Cumberland County, Bradford, J.) denying their motion to dismiss the complaint of Jeffrey Rosenbery and Pamela Rosenbery (Rosenberys) for lack of personal jurisdiction of Millwork. 1 We agree with the Rosenberys’ contention that this appeal is interlocutory, and accordingly, we dismiss the appeal.

The record reflects the following facts: On January 28, 1998, as a result of arbitration, the Rosenberys received a default award of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Maine State Employees Ass'nSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
  2. Department of Human Services v. LowatchieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  3. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Bodwell Granite Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1906
  4. Milstar Manufacturing Corp. v. Waterville Urban Renewal AuthoritySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1976
  5. Fern Const. Co., Inc. v. BinnallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
  2. Spack v. PuorroSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  3. IHT CORP. v. Paragon Cutlery Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2002
  4. Breus v. BezborodkoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API