State v. IBARRA-CISNEROS
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.
¶1 Petitioner Gilberto Ibarra-Cisneros and his brother, Adrian Ibarra-Raya, were separately prosecuted on drug charges in November 2006. Both moved unsuccessfully to suppress evidence discovered as a result of the warrantless search of Ibarra-Raya’s home. In particular, Ibarra-Cisneros argued to suppress the evidence against him as the fruit of the unlawful use of Ibarra-Raya’s *882cell phone, which was seized during the search. The Court of Appeals determined that the search of Ibarra-Raya’s home was unlawful, but that “any connection between Mr. Ibarra-Raya’s cell phone and the bindle found at…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. ChildressCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
- State v. LeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- State v. Tan LeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. SweanyWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. MayfieldWashington Supreme Court · 2019
- State v. SamaliaWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- State v. CornwellWashington Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.