Legal Opinion

State v. Mayfield

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 2019No. 95632-4PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYu, J.

*874¶ 1 This case concerns an exception to the federal exclusionary rule known as the attenuation doctrine. The attenuation doctrine provides that evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution is not subject to the exclusionary rule if "the connection between unconstitutional police conduct and the evidence is remote or has been interrupted by some intervening circumstance." Utah v. Strieff, 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2056, 2061, 195 L.Ed.2d 400 (2016). We are asked whether the attenuation doctrine is compatible with article I, section 7 of the Washington…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. MuhammadWashington Supreme Court · 2019
  2. In re Pers. Restraint of MonschkeWashington Supreme Court · 2021
  3. State Of Washington, Res/cross-app. v. Heather Anne Alexander, App/cross-res..Court of Appeals of Washington · 2019
  4. State Of Washington, V. Malcolm Otha McgeeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2023
  5. State of Washington v. Christopher R. MorrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API