People v. Hester
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BROWN, J.
California Rules of Court, rule 412(b) provides: “By agreeing to a specified prison term personally and by counsel, a defendant who is sentenced to that term or a shorter one abandons any claim that a component of the sentence violates [Penal Code] section 654’s prohibition of double punishment, unless that claim is asserted at the time the agreement is recited on the record.”1
The question presented by this case is whether rule 412(b) is invalid because it conflicts with section 654. We conclude there is no conflict.
Factual and Procedural Background
Defendant broke into his…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by182 opinions
- People v. CunninghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Rhodes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2007
- People v. FrenchCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
- People v. ButtramCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- San Diego County Health & Human Services Agency v. Kevin M.California Court of Appeal · 2011
177 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.