Legal Opinion
Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 7, 1991PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Irma Vidal Santaella, J.), entered September 17, 1990, which denied plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (CPLR 3212) dismissing a counterclaim and certain affirmative defenses of defendant premised on alleged fraud, and denied defendant’s cross-motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and for leave to amend its answer to include counterclaims for rescission and to assert two affirmative defenses based upon mutual and unilateral mistake, unanimously modified on the law to the extent of granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
- McConnell v. Commonwealth Pictures Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Cherchio v. AlleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- D'Alessandro v. CarroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Wildman & Bernhardt Construction, Inc. v. BPM AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Pixel International Network, Inc. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Jolly King Restaurant, Inc. v. Hershey Chan Realty, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Martinez v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.