Legal Opinion

Martinez v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 21, 1992PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Orders of the Supreme Court, Bronx County (Lewis Friedman, J.), entered on March 22, 1990 and May 13, 1991, which, respectively, denied plaintiffs’ application to restore their action to the calendar, and denied renewal and reargument, unanimously reversed, on the law and the facts, and in the exercise of discretion, renewal granted and upon renewal the application granted, and the action restored to the calendar, upon condition that plaintiffs’ attorney pay $500 to defendant within 30 days of service upon it of this order with notice of entry, without costs.

While we concur fully in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Foley v. RocheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Pirnak v. SavinoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  3. Oppenheimer & Co. v. Oppenheim, Appel, Dixon & Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  4. Massachusetts Bay Insurance v. Guardian Escrow Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. Javind Apt. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  2. Salzano v. MastrantonioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Leary v. Pou Poune, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  4. Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC v. New York State Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  5. Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC v. New York State Public Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API