Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Beno
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 21, 1983No. Docket 61368PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJ. H. Gillis, J.
Defendant, James J. Beño, D.C., a licensed chiropractor, appeals as of right from a circuit court order enjoining him from engaging in *345certain activities alleged to be outside the scope of the practice of chiropractic.
In September, 1977, plaintiff filed a complaint seeking to enjoin defendant from engaging in certain practices. At the time the action was commenced, the practice of chiropractic was defined in the chiropractic act, former MCL 338.151 et seq.; MSA 14.591 et seq. The former act was subsequently repealed and replaced by the Michigan Public Health Code, 1978 PA 368, effective…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Greenfield Construction Co. v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1978
- Janssen v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1974
- Attorney General v. Recorder's Court JudgeMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
- Attorney General v. RaguckasMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney General v. BenoMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Wengel v. HerfertMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- People v. Ham-YingMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Attorney General v. BenoMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
- Attorney General v. BenoMichigan Supreme Court · 1985