Legal Opinion
Travelers Mut. Casualty Co. v. Herman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 6, 1941No. 11761PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DEWEY, District Judge.
The trial court found that a reimbursement clause as between an insurer and insured was invalid under the laws of Kansas.
The record discloses that Mabel C. Herman of Fremont, Nebraska, as a part of her business owned and caused to be operated tractors and semi-trailers to haul petroleum products in the States of Kansas and Nebraska.
On September 3, 1937, the appellant,Travelers Mutual Casualty Company, issued to her a policy of automobile liability insurance. At that time Section 66-1,128, General Statutes of Kansas 1935, provided that: “No certificate or license shall be…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Continental Baking Co. v. WoodringSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Dunn v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
- State v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
- W. A. Hover & Co. v. Denver & R. G. W. R.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Louis v. BoyntonDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1931
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Bennett v. The Preferred Acc. Ins. Co. Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Prickett v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
- Rural Mutual Insurance v. PetersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1986
- Fitzgerald v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
- Carolina Casualty Insurance Company v. Pennsylvania Threshermen & Farmers' Mutual Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.