Legal Opinion

Rural Mutual Insurance v. Peterson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 18, 1986No. 85-0272PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBablitch, J.

LeRoy 0. Peterson (Peterson) is the insured of Rural Mutual Insurance Company (Rural). He appeals a summary judgment granting Rural’s claim for reimbursement from him for $111,718.52 which was paid by Rural to an injured third party pursuant to Wisconsin’s common carrier financial responsibility law. This court accepted certification from the court of appeals to decide 1) whether Rural is entitled to reimbursement from Peterson under the terms of its policy, and if so, 2) whether Peterson is entitled to a trial to determine his percentage of negligence and the amount of damages so that he may…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. First National Leasing Corp. v. City of MadisonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Cunningham v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Swedish American National Bank of Minneapolis v. KoebernickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Texas Ass'n of Counties County Government Risk Management Pool v. Matagorda CountyTexas Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Shannon v. ShannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Nelson v. McLaughlinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Martin v. Milwaukee Mutual Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
  5. American Motorists Insurance v. R & S Meats, Inc.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API