Marshall v. Charleston & Savannah Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Klugh, J., Charleston, April, 1899. Action by Sallie T. Marshall, administratrix of J. C. Marshall, against Charleston and Savannah Railway Co. Defendant is appellant. 23 S. C., 226; 54 S. C., 95, 141; 36 S. C., 585. 53 S. C., 215.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Jones.
The jury in this action found a verdict for the defendant, which was set aside and a new trial granted. The appeal is from the order granting a new trial. The well settled rule is that this Court cannot review an order refusing or granting a new trial, except for error of law, as the Court is without jurisdiction to review the judgment of the Circuit Court on questions of' fact. The order appealed from is as follows: “The plaintiff gave notice of a motion for a new trial on the minutes of the Court. After hearing counsel' for and…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Daughty v. Northwestern RailroadSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1912
- Sellars v. CollinsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
- Ingram v. Hines, Dir. Gen.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
- Snipes v. Davis, Director GeneralSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1925
- Donkle v. ForsterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.